It is the season of standardized testing in the Oakland elementary schools, so I wanted to take the opportunity to broach the subject of what role these tests play in the Oakland community.
I understand that in many ways, Oakland has no choice but to participate in having students take these exams, e.g. NJ ASK; and, I am sure, in rare instances, the test might actually serve a purpose.
Overall, I believe the emphasis being placed on standardized testing is a serious detriment to the educational system in Oakland. The list of reasons why these tests are detrimental is too long to enumerate, but they are well known to academics and parents alike.
The fundamental benefit of a local school board and school district is so that the values of the community can be reflected in the schools. Otherwise, what purpose do they serve?
I propose a simple policy that would reflect the values of most Oakland parents, and help Oakland be a leader in trying to protect the integrity of the educational process – protect the essence of education.
My proposal is that Oakland adopts a policy regarding the placement of students – into either gifted or remedial classes – based on their teachers’ recommendation; standardized test scores will not be used in district by any administrator, principal, committee, or department heads – to judge, label or evaluate a child.
A student’s teacher can use the standardized test scores as one of many evaluation tools available, and that is appropriate. Only the classroom teacher can appreciate the diversity of each student; and, only the classroom teacher is in a position to appreciate the true talents, skills and challenges faced by each student.
Every rule has its exceptions, and undoubtedly there would be situations where a teacher’s recommendation may be challenged – and standardized test scores may be brought into the discussion. These exceptions would not devalue the rule aimed at returning to teachers and students the respect and dignity their efforts deserve.
Standardized testing, while popular in some circles, is growing very unpopular across the nation among teachers, students and parents – for very, very good reasons. In Oakland, we can take a small step, plant a small seed, that reflects the complexity of the educational process. While this proposal, unfortunately, would change very little with concerning how students experience these exams – it would speak volumes with respect to how Oakland as a community views our teachers and students.
“Non scholae, sed vitae discimus”, is the motto of many schools all over the world – and for good reason, we do not learn for the school, but for life.
Charlie McCormick
Well Stated!